Wouldn't call first gen 3DTVs "high-priced". Samsung's lower models start at $3,500au - considering first gen plasmas were $20,000 3D is comparatively cheap.

As for the Sony offer, do they honestly expect to bring in customers with that? I mean, I know they're doing their annual end of financial year PS3 deal atm, but even so "buy a 3.5k plus extras tv and get $100 worth of value-questionable content free" - score!

It's more like "buy a 3.5k TV and have some actual 3D content to watch on it", if you ask me. Looks like Sony are being slow in any case, I don't see any 3D updates on the PSN store.

Apparently Batman Arkham Asylum was 3D.. this customer I had was 100% sure of it but I didn't believe him. Turns out there was some truth behind his claim though, the GOTY version has 3D tech.

This sounds lke a smart idea, publishers could re-release their most recent big titles as GOTY with 3D compat and I think it would sell pretty well. The market may be new, but I think the buzz around 3D TV has been more successful than blu-ray when it first came out.

does anybody give a shit about 3d gaming?

Er... Sure?

I like the idea of it without ever having tried it.

I wanna give it a go, I've seen a monitor based 3D thing, the z-monitor, running Crysis and Far Cry 2 and that was actually pretty cool. But I think the Nvidia glasses solution is supposed to work better, and 'cause I didn't wanna fork out for another monitor (needs to be at least 100hz) it just didn't happen.

So, chances are, I'll get there eventually. I do think some games could be mega cool with it.

I'm completely stoked about 3D gaming, but I'll wait for the bugs to be ironed out. I just see it being a long time before it really comes to fruition.

I don't think there's as much buzz around 3D as there was HD though MC. At any rate - I'm still waitin/praying for VR, matrix style ^_^

i had 3d glasses with my very first nvidia geforce - i NEVER used them.
the only way 3d gaming is going to get accepted imho, is if they do the same technology as the no-glasses tv's. you shouldnt have to have another peripheral cluttering up the place.

True Zen - I didn't know they had 3DTVs that didn't require glasses - though it would make sense to invest in the idea.

Just like the 3DS I guess. I imagine it's a more expensive tech than glasses-less 3D on a large scale.

I gotta say; I'm pumped for when it works really well. You see stuff in 3D normally, even if you kind of forget, so I don't see why people have an issue with having 3D displays.

I reckon the first 3D OS will be very cool. Like windows with depth.

Windows 3D: A whole new dimension to crash in!

the bluescreen jumps out and hits you in the face!

Windows 3D was your idea.