Latest Gaming News

Diablo III On the Way

PC

29th June 2008, 6:53pm
click to view full image
view full

I'm sure some of you are saying "about time!", but hey, better late than never, right? Blizzard has finally officially revealed Diablo III in their worldwide invitational in France. It'll be hitting both PCs and Mac: no word on console versions or a release date yet (one of those "when it's done" things). They did say they were hoping for a worldwide simultaneous release though (something Nintendo should learn from).

Drop in/out co-op seems to be all the rage these days, and Blizzard has announced that it'll feature in the new game. Random dungeons will feature as well as static maps. More info as we have it!

Share |

Reader Comments:
Sliced Robot
Posted by Sliced Robot 29/06/2008 6:53pm

I'm sure some of you are saying "about time!", but hey, better late than never, right? Blizzard has finally officially revealed Diablo III in their worldwide invitational in France. It'll be hitting both PCs and Mac: no word on console versions or a release date yet (one of those "when it's done" things). They did say they were hoping for a worldwide simultaneous release though (something Nintendo should learn from).

Drop in/out co-op seems to be all the rage these days, and Blizzard has announced that it'll feature in the new game. Random dungeons will feature as well as static maps. More info as we have it!

Julz
Posted by Julz 29/06/2008 9:36pm
I could see Diablo working as a console title. The game dynamics (based on Diablo 2) would be easily transferrable. Unlike the attempt with Balder's Gate on Xbox... That series is PC-only.
zen
Posted by zen 29/06/2008 9:43pm
have you SEEN the new one? its all about the multiplayer baby - this thing looks AWESOME!
abso-friggin-gorgeus-george - cant WAIT for this sucker
moodycj
Posted by moodycj 29/06/2008 9:46pm
http://www.videogamer.com/pc/diablo_2/news-7020.html
It's a bit old but still they haven't done very well with their console efforts in the past.
G-Train
Posted by G-Train 29/06/2008 10:32pm
I'm a little torn over this.

Despite my love for the Diablo seriers - arguably among the best RPGs out there - I kinda don't see what I can get from this game when I have WoW.

I'm happy to see it being finally released, but with the birth of MMOs - old style RPGs are a little dead to me. I guess I'll just have to wait and see how it all turns out.
400 Turtles
Posted by 400 Turtles 29/06/2008 10:59pm
Dumbing it down for consoles would be a terrible move. They should leave it on PC.
Posted by karaoke 30/06/2008 12:45am
No offence,but I've never been able to understand what the appeal is in playing point and click games.
Fair enough they're basic enough to play & I have played a little bit of some myself, but I guess that because it just basically involves point and click-click-click-click over & over,I've personally found it too be just a little bit tedious after a while.
Then again,I suppose that I just prefer something that has a little bit more involvement to it. 
nshady
Posted by nshady 30/06/2008 12:53am
You know this isn't a point and click adventure, right? Not like Myst.
Posted by karaoke 30/06/2008 1:06am
You know this isn't a point and click adventure, right? Not like Myst.


My mistake then, but that's what I thought the first two were & I'd just assumed that this would be the same just as you seemed to assume that Myst is the only one that I've ever played.   lol



nshady
Posted by nshady 30/06/2008 1:13am
I didn't presume you played Myst, it's just the game that everyone knows as typifying the genre.

You might actually like Diablo - check out a vid of it if you can.
400 Turtles
Posted by 400 Turtles 30/06/2008 2:30am
Wouldn't a better title to put Diablo under be 'ungeon Crawler'?
Julz
Posted by Julz 30/06/2008 9:03am
I'm a little torn over this.

Despite my love for the Diablo seriers - arguably among the best RPGs out there - I kinda don't see what I can get from this game when I have WoW.

I'm happy to see it being finally released, but with the birth of MMOs - old style RPGs are a little dead to me. I guess I'll just have to wait and see how it all turns out.


I can't stand MMOs, there's no goal. That's why you play other RPGs, because you get to the end (and it has one!) and it's fulfilling. There's also a directly involved story.
Posted by karaoke 30/06/2008 9:14am
I didn't presume you played Myst, it's just the game that everyone knows as typifying the genre.

You might actually like Diablo - check out a vid of it if you can.


Anyway,putting assumptions & presumtions aside I've found a couple of free downloads to play demos of Diablo I & II on the official Blizz site, so just out of curiosity more than anything I'll have a look at them I suppose. But if they're not for me & I don't like them,then I'm sure that they'll keep the kids amused during the school holidays so that I don't have to hear "I'm bored" on the very first day after school breaks up for them. lol
moodycj
Posted by moodycj 30/06/2008 10:42am
I didn't presume you played Myst, it's just the game that everyone knows as typifying the genre.

You might actually like Diablo - check out a vid of it if you can.

Well you do use pointing and clicking to move and attack but you should really try them for your self.
G-Train
Posted by G-Train 30/06/2008 3:13pm
Its kinda like WoW, but from a top-down-corner viewpoint and there no auto attack.

Same itemisation, spells, talent trees etc - but much more solo oriented and theres no healing, just health pot spamming.

WoW is really the best elements or Warcraft and Diablo combined - If you haven't played it before, I imagine youll be sitting there for the few first days saying "Hey, Frostbolt! I know what that does!"

I can understand how people get sick of point-n-click, but the theory of itemisation is so obsessive! And it has quite a good story also.

As for your hate of MMOs Julz, I can understand where our coming from, but open-ended RPG have alot to offer, for starters you never get to the point where you say "Well, Ive finished this game, it has nothing more to offer - what else can I play?" Theres always something more to do, which is aggrivating at the same time I suppose.

I'll see how it pans out - If diablo III becomes Diablo II with better graphics, itemisation, longer and more varied with the same gameplay - but with teh added twist that you can hook up with friends and quest, It may very well take over my MMO slot. I'd prefer a game I don't have to play obsessively to accomplish anything worth while (eg, 1 month of pvp to get a decent armor set).
zen
Posted by zen 30/06/2008 10:05pm
conversely im against the mmorpg - i prefer playing with myself
d3 is supposed to be a more team oriented game - i just hope its not required
moodycj
Posted by moodycj 30/06/2008 10:20pm
conversely im against the mmorpg - i prefer playing with myself
d3 is supposed to be a more team oriented game - i just hope its not required

Same I don't really get the online rpg thing. Plus I can't imagine having to put in the kind of hours MMO's often require.
Predator
Posted by Predator 01/07/2008 9:38am
Sexy.. can't wait.. I like the top-down RPG's, about time we had another good one on PC.

I've never really felt I could get into WOW, but Diablo 3 I could..

p.s. screen now attached
Posted by karaoke 01/07/2008 10:21am
Plus I can't imagine having to put in the kind of hours MMO's often require.

Well that is kind of true in a way,but I personally think that you only really have to put in a lot of time & effort into them if say for example you're one of those people who wants to stay up to date with all of the best items etc. that there is to offer at the time in the game.
On the other hand,if that's not your type of thing,then a few hours here and a few hours there are all that it really takes if maybe all you want to do is a bit of questing,rep grinding,raiding or whatever. It just all depends on what style of player you are I suppose and whether or not you have the time to spare in RL to do it.

The most time that I've personally ever spent on doing something since I've been playing WoW for example was the whole time that I spent farming & rep grinding my butt off because I really wanted to get a Netherwing Drake. I basically ended doing all of that on & off during most of the day & night over the xmas holidays and that's about it. Other than that though,I've done bugger all really.  lol
G-Train
Posted by G-Train 01/07/2008 7:12pm
You get back what you put in with MMOs.

If you stack in the hours raiding/rep grinding/PvP'in - you get good gear and other items in return. But if you don't have the time or don't want to put it in, you pretty much put up with the basic gear, and alot of peopel aren't happy with that, hence the obsession.

I used to play it alot mroe then I do now, raiding etc regularly - but I can't be bothered with all that anymore, and now I tend to play a few hrs a day, run an instance with the guild here and there, thats about it.
moodycj
Posted by moodycj 01/07/2008 7:19pm
You get back what you put in with MMOs.

If you stack in the hours raiding/rep grinding/PvP'in - you get good gear and other items in return. But if you don't have the time or don't want to put it in, you pretty much put up with the basic gear, and alot of peopel aren't happy with that, hence the obsession.

I used to play it alot mroe then I do now, raiding etc regularly - but I can't be bothered with all that anymore, and now I tend to play a few hrs a day, run an instance with the guild here and there, thats about it.

I want good gear without putting in those sort of hours.
Posted by karaoke 01/07/2008 7:27pm
I want good gear without putting in those sort of hours.


Who doesn't want that though ?      lol
moodycj
Posted by moodycj 01/07/2008 7:35pm

I want good gear without putting in those sort of hours.


Who doesn't want that though ?      lol

Well you can get it with Diablo. 
400 Turtles
Posted by 400 Turtles 01/07/2008 8:03pm
I don't really see the appeal of MMOs at all. They seem more like work than fun, really.
G-Train
Posted by G-Train 01/07/2008 9:47pm
I don't really see the appeal of MMOs at all. They seem more like work than fun, really.



When you finally get the item you've been rep grinding for, or finally complete a set - its quite rewarding, and then you can sit back and look at something you've created - plus show it off ^_^

Yes, thats lame from a certain POV, but at the end of any other type of gaem, the only thing you have to show at the end of your gaming is a RSI, or a tradable DVD.
moodycj
Posted by moodycj 01/07/2008 9:55pm

I don't really see the appeal of MMOs at all. They seem more like work than fun, really.



When you finally get the item you've been rep grinding for, or finally complete a set - its quite rewarding, and then you can sit back and look at something you've created - plus show it off ^_^

Yes, thats lame from a certain POV, but at the end of any other type of gaem, the only thing you have to show at the end of your gaming is a RSI, or a tradable DVD.

I don't play games to have something to show people though and If I want to create something there are plenty of games that let you do that like sim city.
Posted by karaoke 01/07/2008 10:44pm
Well you can get it with Diablo.  
[/quote]

But does it have private servers though where you could basically get it all in about a day or so if you really wanted to ?   

[quote author=G-Train link=topic=15812.msg171081#msg171081 date=1214912828]
When you finally get the item you've been rep grinding for, or finally complete a set - its quite rewarding, and then you can sit back and look at something you've created - plus show it off ^_^

I agree that it is very rewarding,especially right at the finish of it all. I suppose it's a little bit like having achieved something that you originally set out to do even though there might be times when you've thought that it would never end.   
As for the showing off part of it, we are talking about WoW here so it's nothing new really.     lol 
400 Turtles
Posted by 400 Turtles 01/07/2008 11:59pm
When you finally get the item you've been rep grinding for, or finally complete a set - its quite rewarding, and then you can sit back and look at something you've created - plus show it off ^_^
[/quote]
And then you get to do it all over again for the better item. You get to show it off to all the other people with better stuff than you too! Awesome.

[quote]But does it have private servers though where you could basically get it all in about a day or so if you really wanted to ?

Close enough. This is pretty much the point of single player RPGs.

Not to mention private servers have broken gameplay and none of this payoff of hard work you say is so appealing of MMOs.
Julz
Posted by Julz 02/07/2008 9:10am
I'm currently playing Rogue Galaxy (29 hrs in) and it promises over 100hrs of gameplay. To me 100hrs is massive. It can take me a year to get through a single game with 100hrs of gameplay (I probably will not have finished this game until December/January). If I transfered the same amount of time into an MMO I would be nowhere in the game. Because a lot of people who play MMOs spend so many hours playing the game the game makes it annoying and pointless for people who have less time to play.

Finishing a good RPG gives me the similar satisfaction of finishing a really good book. I never sell my games (I still have some PS1 games) for the same reason you don't sell a good book. You can go back and play them and still enjoy the story and the gameplay. There may not be immediate replayability but they're definitely able to be happily replayed. Also, in the time that people spend playing MMOs you can play so many more other games and experience other stories. I.e. in the time people have spent on WoW I could have played at least 50-80 single RPGs (giving them between 60-100 total hrs).
Posted by karaoke 02/07/2008 1:14pm
When it all comes down to it, everyone's different & no-one's the same so I guess that it just depends on a person's individuality(or whatever you call it ) when it comes to their own personal preferences.
Master Chief
Posted by Master Chief 11/07/2008 1:51am
Interesting fact - WoW took 3 years and almost 3 months to be released after it was officially announced.

Diablo 3 coming August 2011?
zen
Posted by zen 11/07/2008 4:22pm
i bloody well hope not! my next pc is riding on this game
nshady
Posted by nshady 12/07/2008 8:41pm
This looks to be a bit less MMO-y.
RJG
Posted by RJG 12/07/2008 9:57pm
This looks to be a bit less MMO-y.


Diablo was never an MMO. That's why it's still awesome.
G-Train
Posted by G-Train 13/07/2008 7:35pm

This looks to be a bit less MMO-y.


Diablo was never an MMO. That's why it's still awesome.




I had to lol - I agree that I pref diablo III as an SP/Co-op optional setup then another MMO, simply cos we alreayd have WoW, and it would just flood the market. That, and I've only been playin WoW half-time for the past month or so and I'm already sick to death of it.

Secodn I can scrap together enough money for a PS3/LCD setup - my subscription ends.
zen
Posted by zen 14/07/2008 9:19am
arent blizzard working on another mmo property? wouldnt that flood the market with another awesome mmo?
as far as i can tell, it will most likely be a starcraft mmo - this wouldnt flood the market since its sci-fi as opposed to fantasy
the sci-fi mmo is very much smaller than the fantasy mmo - check out all the korean ones as an example
nshady
Posted by nshady 15/07/2008 4:48am

[quote author=nshady link=topic=15812.msg171413#msg171413 date=1215859274]
This looks to be a bit less MMO-y.
[/quote]

Diablo was never an MMO. That's why it's still awesome.


My point was in relation to Dave saying it took three years for WoW to be released, and given that this looks less MMO-y it shouldn't take as long.

I had to lol - I agree that I pref diablo III as an SP/Co-op optional setup then another MMO, simply cos we alreayd have WoW, and it would just flood the market. That, and I've only been playin WoW half-time for the past month or so and I'm already sick to death of it.

Secodn I can scrap together enough money for a PS3/LCD setup - my subscription ends.
G-Train
Posted by G-Train 18/07/2008 2:28pm
I just checked out the new talent tables for WotLK (WoW) and they are *heavily* drawing from Diablo again.

eg:
Warriors = Barbs. Getting 2h weaps in each hand - Leap attack etc
Death Knights = Necros. Summon undead minions, corpse explo, poison weap etc

While this isn't a WoW topic obviously - It does start me wondering how much Diablo III will draw from WoW and the general Warcraft universe.
moodycj
Posted by moodycj 18/07/2008 2:41pm
I just checked out the new talent tables for WotLK (WoW) and they are *heavily* drawing from Diablo again.

eg:
Warriors = Barbs. Getting 2h weaps in each hand - Leap attack etc
Death Knights = Necros. Summon undead minions, corpse explo, poison weap etc

While this isn't a WoW topic obviously - It does start me wondering how much Diablo III will draw from WoW and the general Warcraft universe.

Chance are a fair bit but I am not really happy about it. I would rather they come up with new stuff but seeing how successful WoW has been I think they would defiantly be looking for ideas they can take from it.
Posted by karaoke 08/08/2008 1:13pm
Found this piece of news pretty interesting & looking forward to seeing what the outcome of it all will be especially after reading some of the comments on there.

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/54086
RJG
Posted by RJG 08/08/2008 2:54pm
Just a typical departure methinks, made all the more "oooh" by the big stink about a perfectly wonderful and blissfully functional art direction.

Because Diablo 2 was all grey scale, wasn't it?

[img]http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/2439/d2ssfj7.jpg[/img]
zen
Posted by zen 08/08/2008 6:55pm
thats cos you have the gamma up! that stage was blood red i tells ya!

i think its stupid that there is so much focus on such a small group of vocal fans - they dont like it? DONT BUY THE GAME! i GAURANTEE you the sales will suffer MAYBE 0.001% - everyone i know is pumped about this game and likes the art
a dark game makes for a hard to see game - who needs that? i dont want to burn out my 24 inch lcd because i had to up the gamma to 100%!
G-Train
Posted by G-Train 08/08/2008 10:49pm
I disagree - I think art and lighting set the atmosphere of a game, along with other aspects of course, but they contribute highly, and messing it up would ruin the game.

I like that bliz is so dedicated to their fans that they would go to such lengths to make sure they get the game right.

Firing someone may be a little overkill, but I Diablo is a dark title, it should be a dark game.
nshady
Posted by nshady 08/08/2008 11:50pm
They didn't fire him because of it, they said they were dedicated to the new style. People are so whiny these days. You're going to buy it anyway, stop bitching.
zen
Posted by zen 09/08/2008 9:11am
maybe they should have two colour palletes or modes or something in the game?
one for the darkies and one for the rest of us normal people?
G-Train
Posted by G-Train 09/08/2008 11:22am
maybe they should have two colour palletes or modes or something in the game?
one for the darkies and one for the rest of us normal people?



I'm not abnormal, Im special!
Posted by karaoke 09/08/2008 11:55am
You're going to buy it anyway, stop bitching.


Sorry to disagree with you nshady,but I'm pretty sure though that the term bitching usually refers to females,in particular the one's who like to sit around with eachother & have a good bitch about other people behind their back which in turn leads to the whole bitching thing.   LOL (no offence intended )
moodycj
Posted by moodycj 09/08/2008 12:57pm

You're going to buy it anyway, stop bitching.


Sorry to disagree with you nshady,but I'm pretty sure though that the term bitching usually refers to females,in particular the one's who like to sit around with eachother & have a good bitch about other people behind their back which in turn leads to the whole bitching thing.   LOL (no offence intended )

It can also be used to imply men are whining like females and that is the way he was using it.
nshady
Posted by nshady 09/08/2008 1:05pm
Yep, it can be an insult to men too.
G-Train
Posted by G-Train 09/08/2008 2:53pm
I prefer Q_Q    it makes me lol
Posted by karaoke 23/08/2008 6:23pm
Seems like there's going to be no Necromancer class for Diablo 3 according to this -

http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2008/08/22/no-necromancer-for-diablo-3/1

"The Necromancer was simply a victim of his own success," said Wilson, "He was just too well crafted as a character."


I'm guessing that means too overpowered perhaps,but don't quote me on that.    lol




G-Train
Posted by G-Train 28/08/2008 3:15pm
Not surprising give nthe witch doctor is half a necromancer anyway.

I agree though that the Necro was the most scalable class and there for the most poerful in Diablo II. I had a level 85 Zookeeper necro, all it took was going to a lowbie area and letting my hireling kill everything, then summon up 10 skels, 10 skel mages, and 15 monsters.

Port to where you want and iron maiden everything in sight, throw in corpse explosion and the fact that my 25-man-army *ALL* recieve a buff from my hireling........OP!

I'm hoping they have some sort of Sorceres spin-off, Mages should have gotten frozen orb in WoW, its only fair Bliz makes up for it in D3.